Difference between revisions of "User talk:Alfonse"

From OpenGL.org
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I only ask that you give constructive criticism or fix the problem instead of merely complaining. I'm not going to devote hours of my time trying to help people like myself looking for answers if that's the case.
 
I only ask that you give constructive criticism or fix the problem instead of merely complaining. I'm not going to devote hours of my time trying to help people like myself looking for answers if that's the case.
 
:Hi, I've added a lot of information to the [[User:ElFarto/OpenGLBM]] page, and was looking for some thoughts on it. [[User:ElFarto|elFarto]] 04:52, 30 September 2011 (PDT)
 
:Hi, I've added a lot of information to the [[User:ElFarto/OpenGLBM]] page, and was looking for some thoughts on it. [[User:ElFarto|elFarto]] 04:52, 30 September 2011 (PDT)
 +
:: Here's the thing. Unless you intend to actually implement this API (perhaps on top of Linux and AMD's low-level stuff), I don't see what the point of discussing it is. Even if this API were the holy grail, it isn't going to be implemented by anyone unless you do the work yourself. So any discussion would be Sophistry; if nothing's going to come of it, what's the point of speculating?
 +
:: However, if you insist, I have added some commentary on the idea. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 11:30, 30 September 2011 (PDT)
 +
 +
I had a previous comment, but I found out it was correct.
 +
Thanks, great job.

Revision as of 12:47, 12 October 2011

I only ask that you give constructive criticism or fix the problem instead of merely complaining. I'm not going to devote hours of my time trying to help people like myself looking for answers if that's the case.

Hi, I've added a lot of information to the User:ElFarto/OpenGLBM page, and was looking for some thoughts on it. elFarto 04:52, 30 September 2011 (PDT)
Here's the thing. Unless you intend to actually implement this API (perhaps on top of Linux and AMD's low-level stuff), I don't see what the point of discussing it is. Even if this API were the holy grail, it isn't going to be implemented by anyone unless you do the work yourself. So any discussion would be Sophistry; if nothing's going to come of it, what's the point of speculating?
However, if you insist, I have added some commentary on the idea. Alfonse 11:30, 30 September 2011 (PDT)

I had a previous comment, but I found out it was correct. Thanks, great job.