The couple more I'm referring to were simply mentioned during the BOF presentation and not on the slides."plus a couple more?" I could understand the assumption that the extensions on the slides would see widespread implementation, but where do you get the "couple more" from?
I personally don't feel like I was misled at all during the whole GL3 thing. I think they failed to communicate effectively with the community, and I think most of this backlash is a result of their prolonged silence. Basically, they didn't mislead anyone; they just didn't lead anyone anywhere. That said, I don't think the API itself is a failure in any way. Their PR on the other hand could use a little work.As for being intentionally misled, isn't that just par for the course with the ARB, who've been doing it for the last 9 months?