Part of the Khronos Group
OpenGL.org

The Industry's Foundation for High Performance Graphics

from games to virtual reality, mobile phones to supercomputers

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Aleksandar

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    211
    Views
    589,016

    Re: Official feedback on OpenGL 3.2 thread

    I didn't try if it really works (maybe it is accidentally exposed by the driver in the extension string), just make a comparison of ARB extension lists of the two drivers. I have only tried...
  2. Replies
    211
    Views
    589,016

    Re: Official feedback on OpenGL 3.2 thread

    The new NV drivers (190.57) implement nine ARB extensions more than 190.56.

    GL_ARB_draw_elements_base_vertex
    GL_ARB_framebuffer_sRGB
    GL_ARB_seamless_cube_map
    GL_ARB_sync...
  3. Replies
    211
    Views
    589,016

    Re: Official feedback on OpenGL 3.2 thread

    Thank you, Barthold!

    Believe it or not I have visited NVidia's site day by day expecting new drivers. :)
    I have already downloaded 190.57 drivers eagerly expecting this afternoon to try them at...
  4. Replies
    211
    Views
    589,016

    Re: Official feedback on OpenGL 3.2 thread

    Has anyone tried to program using new NV drivers? I have a problem with them (190.56 beta for XP32), because when try to bind VAO (e.g. glBindVertexArray(m_vaoID[0]);) CPU is 100% utilized (both...
  5. Replies
    211
    Views
    589,016

    Re: Official feedback on OpenGL 3.2 thread

    Have you read GLSLangSpec.1.40.07 (May 1st 2009)?


    And I don't know why it is important at all? Because...

    Only Catalyst drivers require precision qualifiers in fragmen shaders. But, maybe...
Results 1 to 5 of 5