View Full Version : ATI X1600 available number of texture instructions exceeded

09-24-2007, 09:16 AM
I have ATI x1600 PRO. I'm implementing a GPU ray cast volume renderer. I'm getting an error that I'm exceeding available number of texture instructions when my loop iteration count is over 127. If I remove my texture accessing operations the program runs in hardware. I thought the card supported loops and branches in the shader. I'm using latest catalyst driver. Any thoughts?

Here's my fragment shader:

uniform vec3 eyePos;
uniform float stepSize;
uniform sampler3D volumeTexture;
uniform sampler1D colourTable;

void main()
vec4 value;

vec3 position = gl_TexCoord[0].stp;
vec3 direction = position - eyePos;
direction = normalize(direction);
vec4 dst = vec4 (0,0,0,0);
for (int i = 0; i < 512; i++)
//get voxel, apply transfer function
value = texture3D(volumeTexture, position);
vec4 src = texture1D(colourTable,value.r);

//front to back compositing
dst = (1.0 - dst.a) * src + dst;

//advance position
position = position + direction * stepSize;
gl_FragColor = dst;

09-24-2007, 02:01 PM
Is it possible to get around the loop limit by breaking the loop into several loops of smaller size?


for( i = 0; i < 128; i++ ) { ... }
for( i = 128; i < 256; i++ ) { ... }
...Then stuff the loop contents into a function (or just duplicate the code).

09-24-2007, 02:26 PM
No that doesn't work unless the sum of the two loops is less than the limit. It looks like it's un-rolling the for loop.

Another interesting thing is if I add any break statement:
if (dst.a > 0.95) break;
the program compiles and links and promises to run in hardware even for 1024 iterations. However I suspect the loop doesn't actually run for all those iterations in all the cases because I see some data missing (I could have made a mistake elsewhere, but I suspect the card to be at fault).

09-25-2007, 10:16 AM
You may try a nested loop: it solved a similar issue I have with a different card though (some Nvidia GeForce 5)


10-03-2007, 08:00 AM
overlay, thank you very much. That actually works. I don't know why, but it does.