I have seen that my gl.h(and two other files)
in /usr/X11R6/lib/GL are those provided by mesa and not the ones in the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run archive.
I don’t know for lib themselves.
The install of the NV*****.run was successful.
Is-it normal?
Moreover, i’ve no glu.h or glut.h but i think mesa was correctly installed from the mdk9.1 CD.
What’s the problem?
I have seen that my gl.h(and two other files)
in /usr/X11R6/lib/GL are those provided by mesa and not the ones in the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run archive.
I don’t know for lib themselves.
The install of the NV*****.run was successful.
Is-it normal?
Moreover, i’ve no glu.h or glut.h but i think mesa was correctly installed from the mdk9.1 CD.
What’s the problem?[/b]
You should run the installer with --opengl-headers to overwrite the mesa ones. I don’t know why there is no glu.h present on your system but glut is not installed by mesa it is an extra package at least on Redhat (I mean fedora core).
I don’t remember ever that nvidia sent glu.h and libgGlu with their drivers. Most people use glu include & glu lib that comes with mesa; on redhat you can compile mesa from src.rpm and it will produce an separate package for glu (so you don’t need to install rest of mesa)