Does keeping all textures the same format provide any benefits? I’ve discussed this with my artist and he has no problem sticking solely to one format (either 16 or 32) but does it hurt to mix the two? And how big is the cost of using 32bit textures over 16bit textures? Obviously 32bit textures take more bandwidth, but if we go with 16bit textures we’ll use twice as many! Hmm… I think I’ll start compiling all this information in a faq
I cant express enough how much I love you guys!!! You help me SOOOO much!! Thank you!!
16-bit textures help exactly as much as you would expect – they take half the memory, they take half as long to download, and they require half as much memory bandwidth.
The question is not what fileformat uses 16-bit texture, the question is what parameters you use when uploading the texture. You can load a 32-bit texture as usual, but select the internal format GL_RGBA4 when uploading the texture with glTexImage2D for example. That will upload the texture as 16-bit RGBA.
Originally posted by zed:
[b]>>ive same format provide any benefits? I’ve discussed this with my artist and he has no problem sticking solely to one format.<<
what graphic file format supports 16bit textures??[/b]
the loading time for decreasing the texture color bit data from 32 bit to 16 bit may a thing to consider if you are loading many, many textures at once. Someone mentioned 64bit textures, heheh… 64bit color would take a whole freaking lot of computation. Plus the eye can’t see more colors that 32bit. But maybe doing things in 64bit would provide more accuracy.
Another thing about having the alpha channel in 16bit files. There is none, but it tries to use colors that are close to the original ones in the alpha channel. So pictures with a lot of alpha and normal color would appear worse quality in 32 bit.
