Part of the Khronos Group
OpenGL.org

The Industry's Foundation for High Performance Graphics

from games to virtual reality, mobile phones to supercomputers

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: AMD support for bindless textures? or when if not?

  1. #1
    Advanced Member Frequent Contributor Mars_999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD, USA
    Posts
    519

    AMD support for bindless textures? or when if not?

    Nvidia has bindless texture support on 600 and 700 series. Does amd have this yet? Or plan on supporting it.

  2. #2
    Senior Member OpenGL Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,948
    It's an NVIDIA extension. One that they have patented.

    So I'm guessing never.

  3. #3
    Advanced Member Frequent Contributor Mars_999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD, USA
    Posts
    519
    Ok so how can this same technique be done on AMD hardware then....

    Thanks

  4. #4
    Senior Member OpenGL Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,948
    Bindless textures aren't a technique; they're a hardware feature. A technique would be something like shadow mapping or deferred rendering.

    What are you trying to do with bindless texturing that you can't do without it?

  5. #5
    Advanced Member Frequent Contributor Mars_999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD, USA
    Posts
    519
    I would like to have access to many textures sample where as before this you were limited to what 16?

  6. #6
    Senior Member OpenGL Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,948
    So even with array textures, that's not enough for you? What are you trying to do in your shader that you need that?

  7. #7
    Advanced Member Frequent Contributor Mars_999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD, USA
    Posts
    519
    texture array would be enough but isn't bindless textures supposed to be faster more efficient? With texture arrays what is the limit 128 for a depth?

  8. #8
    Senior Member OpenGL Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,948
    texture array would be enough but isn't bindless textures supposed to be faster more efficient?
    Don't assume that NVIDIA's press releases speak the absolute truth. And you still never answered my question: what are you trying to do?

    With texture arrays what is the limit 128 for a depth?
    It would have taken you 5 minutes of research to find out for yourself that 3.3 requires a minimum of 256 layers. And FYI: the HD3300 provides 8192 array layers.

  9. #9
    Advanced Member Frequent Contributor Mars_999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD, USA
    Posts
    519
    I wanted to texture terrain with it and have endless tile combos so the terrain looks unique... sick of splatting as its so predictable

    Thanks....

  10. #10
    Senior Member OpenGL Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,128
    Just curious: Splatting is pretty much a no-brainer, but yeah, it's getting old - literally. What's the difference with your technique? Any papers relating to that or is it your own creation?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •