Part of the Khronos Group
OpenGL.org

The Industry's Foundation for High Performance Graphics

from games to virtual reality, mobile phones to supercomputers

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Has Intel's stone age of OpenGL finally past?

  1. #1
    Senior Member OpenGL Pro Aleksandar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,146

    Smile Has Intel's stone age of OpenGL finally past?

    It seems that the stone age of Intel's OpenGL has finally past.
    http://www.geeks3d.com/20120506/inte...gl-extensions/

  2. #2
    Super Moderator OpenGL Lord
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Grenoble - France
    Posts
    5,580
    14 years after the Intel740, maybe Intel can be relevant in rich 3D acceleration.
    Hoping it will take less time for fast 3D acceleration...

  3. #3
    Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    268
    It probably wont be more relevant then it is on D3D side.

  4. #4
    Senior Member OpenGL Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,948
    I see absolutely nothing on that page talking about driver quality. Sure, they're implementing a higher version number. But if their implementation doesn't work, just as their 3.0 implementation doesn't work, then what's the point?

    Plus, it's not like they're back-porting this to all of their pre-Ivy Bridge hardware. So you still can't rely on Intel actually working.

  5. #5
    Senior Member OpenGL Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,128
    Just a fun side-note: On Linux, where they managed to be the first to push GL 3.0 to the MESA stack (which personally I commend them for), their GLSL compiler spits out error messages which aren't really that helpful. They go as far as putting the actual symbolic constants used by the parser, like "NEW_IDENTIFIER" and so on, in to shader logs. Compared to NVIDIA and AMD it's quite ridiculous.

  6. #6
    Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    268
    Quote Originally Posted by Alfonse Reinheart View Post
    I see absolutely nothing on that page talking about driver quality.
    What would you expect them to write about driver quality?
    "our driver is higher quality now", "we pass all conformance tests"?

    A list of bugfixes would be nice i guess.

  7. #7
    Senior Member OpenGL Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,948
    What would you expect them to write about driver quality?
    My point was that them claiming support for a higher version does not indicate improved support for OpenGL. Odds are, they just want the bullet point, just like they did for 3.0.

    Note that the support is 4.0, not 4.1 or 4.2, even though 4.1 has been out for over a year now. That suggests that they still don't care; they just want the bullet point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •