Part of the Khronos Group
OpenGL.org

The Industry's Foundation for High Performance Graphics

from games to virtual reality, mobile phones to supercomputers

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: curious to your performance stats using gf2

  1. #1
    Junior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    167

    curious to your performance stats using gf2

    Using a geforce 2 ultra 64mb
    running fullscreen 640x480x32
    on win2k rendering absolutley
    nothing except the fps.

    I get approximatley 2000 fps.
    Im curious as to what you guys get.
    Please ease my conscience! I just
    want to make sure I'm doin everything
    right, lol. Thx for replying if ya
    do.

    Old GLman

  2. #2
    Junior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Germany, Hannover
    Posts
    224

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    dont know, but i have around 900fps on gf2 gts on 1024*763*32 drawing nothing ... except primitive framecounter version

  3. #3
    Junior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    167

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    T2k, thanks for the info. I ran those settings and got about the same fps. Your were a little higher, may I ask your processor speed?

  4. #4
    Senior Member OpenGL Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Bonn, Germany
    Posts
    1,652

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    2000 fps? Is that with or without clearing buffers?

  5. #5
    Junior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    167

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    Thats with clearing the buffers. Maybe im calculating my fps wrong? Keep in mind in not rendering anything other than my fps, which is just some simple text. This seems fine to me considering the low resolution and a powerful video card. My processor is also athlon 1.1.

    EDIT: This message does have a point. Its helpin me out. I just wanted to get a feel for how performance should be with the above mentioned hardware.

    Old GLman

    [This message has been edited by Old GLman (edited 03-14-2002).]

  6. #6
    Senior Member OpenGL Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Bonn, Germany
    Posts
    1,652

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    Doh, yeah, your numbers do look right. I currently reach around 1600~1700 frames 640x480x32 with buffer clearing and some modest text display on a RadeonDDR (166MHz) and an Athlon700.

    These numbers may be somewhat off because that's through an emulation layer (yay!) so I'm not directly working the card. But I figure that with very little geometry, we're both limited by the bandwith requirements of the buffer clears.

  7. #7
    Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kingston, Jamaica, W.I.
    Posts
    268

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    This is only slightly related to the above. I've heard minimum FPS to simulate motion is 33. For flicker free animation go for 75 FPS. So I figure once your doing above 75 you should be fine. So, apart from the beauty of seeing sheer power at work, why would you want FPS in the hundreds. I figured that extra processing time could go to AI or processing or something else.

    Then again, am I really that much a relic from the past?

  8. #8
    Junior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    167

    Re: curious to your performance stats using gf2

    You have a good point, and I completely agree. It seems to me that it would be more logical to have the engine run as fast a possible, and choreograph the objects in the scene, rather than just limit the fps. However it is still nice to see sheer power at work

    Old GLman

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •