Which method is faster - glVertex OR glDrawPixels

[powervr]

Hi,

I would like to draw a lot of points(i.e. pixels) on the screen, I would like to know which of the following methods is faster.

1. Using glDrawPixels
2. Using glVertex

Thanks. :)

[dorbie]

DrawPixels will almost certainly be faster but will only draw a regular rectangle of points and will not project that rectangle in 3D, it will only project the origin of the rectangle then draw the regular array of information.

[roffe]

For your benchmarking adventures I would also try using a single texture and glTexSubImage2D for updates. Try NV_pixel_data_range if available/wait for ARB_Pixel_Buffer_Object some more.

[powervr]

Originally posted by dorbie:
DrawPixels will almost certainly be faster but will only draw a regular rectangle of points and will not project that rectangle in 3D, it will only project the origin of the rectangle then draw the regular array of information.Thanks.

As I am only concerning 2D space, so I should use drawPixel. :)

[dorbie]

If you just do it once yes, however if you're animating you should almost certainly load to a texture and draw a textured quad, even for the 2D case, it will be faster guaranteed (provided you use bind texture objects). It may even be faster for a single draw call since texture loading is optimized.

Keep it simple at first then try to optimize with fancy memory extensions.

[powervr]

hi dorbie,

thanks for your reply.

In fact, what i am doing is to fill a large area by pixels.

today i have tried to compare the speed of using glDrawPixels & glVertex

it seems to me that when i repeat a lot of - glrasterpos() + glDrawPixels(), the speed is slower than glvertex()

the code is :
-------------
GLfloat single_point[3] = {255,0,0};
glRasterPos2d(x,y);
glDrawPixels(1,1, GL_RGBA , GL_FLOAT , single_point )

any suggestion?
:)

[chowe6685]

put all the pixels an array and call
glDrawPixels(width, length, GL_RGBA, GL_FLOAT, pointarray);

that will be MUCH faster