>From owner-opengl-arb@dilow  Thu May 9 20:28:34 1996
From: "Paula Womack" <womack@tessera>
To: opengl-arb@sgi.sgi.com
Cc: womack@tessera
Subject: proposal for ctk (from last ARB meeting)
Date: Thu, 09 May 96 20:27:38 -0700


The proposal from the last ARB meeting for changes to
ctk is included below.  This was hand written and copies
were handed out.

Before voting we discussed whether ARB members were
comfortable voting on pseudo code or whether they felt
that they needed to vote on the actual C code for
the conformance tests.  If I remember correctly, the
group concluded unananimously that it was OK to vote
on psuedo code.

Then we voted to approve the proposal below (it wasn't
unanimous but I don't remember the actual count)

Paula

=====================================================
 womack@sgi.com        415-933-1946        MS 8U-590

----------------

Proposed changes to ctk:

DisplayInit():  (in ctkx.c)
	- check for GLX 1.1 (compile-time and run-time)
	- if GLX 1.1, check for visual rating extension
	  (compile-time and run-time checks)
	- set flag if visual rating extension supported

GetVisual():  (in ctkx.c)
	For each visual in list:
	 - If visual rating extension supported, then
	   get the visual caveat attribute value
	 - If visual caveat is NON_CONFORMANT,
	   add visual to unsupported list and set
	   conformant flag to FALSE
	 - Only add visual to master list if USE_GL
	   is True and conformant flag is true

MachineReport():  (in shell.c)
	Print out list of non-conformant visuals.